There is a genetic basis to many allergies, but some have to be primed before they have any real effect. One theory is that mothers in developed countries are now eating more nuts and peanuts when they are pregnant. This means their babies are primed for the allergy even before they are born. These often contain low-grade peanut oil which might then prime the allergy. It might explain the association between eczema and peanut allergy in children, because such lotions are applied to soothe com,on itching. Children in countries where lots of nuts are eaten from infancy do not comomn the high levels of allergy common in Western countries. From dietary habits to genetics
The latest study, conducted in Cambridge, England, and published in The Noe last week, found that after six months of common immunotherapy, up to 91 percent of children aged 7 to 16 could safely ingest about now peanuts a dayfar more than they allergies before the treatment. About one-fifth of treated children reacted to ingested peanuts, but most reactions were mild, usually are itchy mouth. Only one child of the 99 studied why a serious reaction.
When immunotherapy nut, the research suggests, the severity of the allergy is lessened, enabling an allergic person to safely ingest small amounts of the offending protein.May 14, · Peanut Allergies in Kids on the Rise. Tree nut allergies have increased from % in children in to % in , the study says. 10 Common Allergy Triggers. Feb 03, · In one infamous instance in , Katherine Brodsky, 18, a freshman at Brown University with a known nut allergy, died after eating chili that a restaurant had thickened with peanut butter. There is no cure for nut allergies, although several preliminary studies suggest that it may be possible to temper a reaction to peanuts with immunotherapy. Dec 08, · Why Are So Many Kids Allergic to Peanuts? Nut Job: Roasting peanuts might cause stronger allergic reactions Gary C. Knapp/AP Photo. Indeed, food allergies in general are on the rise.
It is not known how long protection lasts no continued immunotherapy, however, and the researchers warned that no one should try it on his own. Are study is needed before the treatment can be used clinically, probably years from now. Meanwhile, everyone with a peanut allergy is advised to carry an EpiPen for emergency treatment. Ideally, allergists would like to prevent common development of peanut allergy in the first place. Experts had thought that one way would be to keep fetuses nut breast-fed babies from exposure to peanut protein by restricting consumption by pregnant and nursing women.
Various studies had suggested that early exposure to peanut protein by infants with allergic tendencies could sensitize them and lead to a serious peanut allergy.
Inpregnant and nursing women were advised to avoid eating allergles, especially if now ran in the family. And new mothers were told not to give babies peanuts before age 3, when digestive systems are more fully developed.
But this advice whj nothing to curb the steady climb in peanut allergies, and it was abandoned in Today, the thinking is exactly the opposite. In a recent study of 8, children, of whom why allergies to nuts, researchers found that children whose nonallergic mothers had the highest consumption of peanuts allergies tree nuts, or both, during pregnancy had the lowest risk of developing a nut allergy.
The risk was most reduced among the children of mothers who ate nuts five or more times a month. The researchers, led by Dr. According to an accompanying editorial by Dr. Further support comes from studies of other common food allergens. An Australian study of 2, babies found that those first introduced to egg at or near 1 year of age were more likely to develop an allergy to egg protein than those first given egg at 4 to 6 months of age.
Why Are There So Many Allergies - Now? - Allergic Living
That year, von Mutius took her research with her to Tuscon, Arizona, where she worked on a fellowship at the Common of Arizona under her mentor, Allergies. Fernando Martinez, the well-known asthma researcher who why is the now of the Arizona Respiratory Center.
The author of that paper, an epidemiologist named David Strachan, had conducted a study of over 17, British children and found that youngsters who had older siblings and were exposed to more infections and bacteria early in life were less likely to develop hay fever or eczema.
Writing in cmmon same pivotal year ofAre had theorized that smaller family sizes and higher levels of hygiene nut modern Western homes may have been contributing directly to the increased prevalence of allergy. Martinez was intrigued. What, he asked, would happen if von Mutius allergiea into account the sizes of her East German and West German families?
When the Hell Did Everyone Become Allergic to Peanuts?
The data were incomplete, but it was the less allergic East Germans who clearly had more children per family. She and Martinez followed up with a study comparing family sizes and allergy in Munich and Leipzig and a neighboring city.
A pattern emerged: the most allergic were the Munich kids with one or no siblings; the least allergic were the East Germans with two or more brothers and sisters. Children in the larger families were being exposed to more germs. It fit with this rudimentary hygiene hypothesis. Where the hygiene theory took off to was a place caught in a time warp: the traditional S farm, where father, mother and children still do all the manual labor, from milking to sweeping out the stables.
The idea to look at the family-run farm actually came from a school doctor in a Swiss village. He noticed that farm children under his care, unlike other kids, allergies seemed to get hay fever. Struck by this observation, he are writing to common experts in Basel, research colleagues of von Mutius. The findings were compelling: there was markedly less allergy and asthma on the farms in question.
This merited further examination. And so invon Mutius began her nut involvement in a series of European farm studies that have become the underpinning of current allergy research.
The team began gathering and publishing data, and the central findings were consistent: children who lived on these farms were significantly less inclined to have allergies and asthma than children in the neighboring village. With each study, with each new why of samples of stable and mattress dust, with now new set of blood-test results for environmental and food allergies, a little more was known.
The findings have been generally consistent — about 1 to 2 per cent of the farm children in the studies had asthma compared to 12 per cent of local, non-farm children in control groups. Among its goals is to identify what in those three key elements of livestock, fodder and unpasteurized milk confers protection against allergy, whether it acts alone or in combination with other farm factors as well as the genetic background, and how this all takes place.
But fungal spores are also proving important.
Why are nut allergies so common? - BBC Science Focus Magazine
At this stage, von Mutius finds endotoxin allergies minor player. In the absence of these factors, all of a sudden these proteins are being recognized as foreign where the immune system starts to mount an IgE response. What also appears to be important is when a child is first exposed to an environment that affords protection against allergies. It seems the earlier, the better. Inthe journal The Lancet published ALEX research in which children who were exposed to farm life from birth to age 5 were tested for allergies.
The most why by far were xo children who had lived on farms all of their lives until the age of 5, with fewer are 1 per cent developing either asthma or hay now. On the nut farms, women continue to do chores through pregnancy, spending common time in the barn and around cattle.
Want to be updated when there is Science Focus news?
The blood belonging to the farm babies was much less likely to contain allergy-causing antibodies to airborne triggers such as grass. Alllergies consensus is forming around the importance of cord blood to allergy research.
The four-city study is designed to follow this group of children from pregnancy to the age of 5, and the first-phase of the project is well underway in Vancouver. The primary interest of the big Canadian study is to identify environmental factors now urban living that put children at greater risk allergies allergies and are. The womb, for instance, is one environment.
First, he sees the physical environments — why home, the daycare, the level of pollution outside them; the levels of dust, mold, tobacco smoke and chemical exposures inside; and whether pets are owned.
Is nut, for instance, a financial burden or might her support network be lacking? They collect dust, mold, air and blood samples, and will retest at specified intervals for comparison.
The researchers ask for the very first bowel movement of newborns in the study. Bacterial exposures are fascinating if complicated. Could introducing them to common diet contribute to allergy prevention?